i would not be satisfied, but I bet many people would. Do yourself a favor, go to U Tube and watch a few vids about these. What is so wrong letting Joe Sixpack show his simpleton friends his "home theater"? You and I know better, but what harm is there, truly? Okay, make RCA not list specs on the package, maybe just show some average screen shots on the package, that alone would sell these. I have questioned the prices and profits of projectors for years, even though I have spent a bundle buying them myself. Besides, whoever going to spend 90 bucks on a projector is even going to read the specs, much less understand them? I bet Epson is afraid that most average people will be satisfied with the adequate big screen looks of the RCA Chinese wonder and then Epsons business model evaporates. We are not talking several thousound at a minimum for a true projector. Prices come down? Dude, last checked, the RCA cost $90. “This practice makes it impossible for consumers to make informed purchase decisions and is damaging to the credibility of the industry and those who support it.”Įpson recently attained a permanent injunction and a $5 million award for damages stemming from successful litigation against iRulu for similar false advertising of lumens ratings. “When manufacturers use blatantly misleading specification claims, it hurts the entire industry,” said Mike Isgrig, Epson’s vice president of consumer sales and marketing. The most egregious offender is the RCA RPJ116-B-Plus, which has an “actual lumens measured” rating of 18 versus a claimed lumens rating of 2,000, according to a press statement circulated by Epson, which said “actual lumens” measurements were obtained via independent testing based on “existing standard procedures.”Įpson further claims Curtis-made projectors sold under other brand names also carry “false lumens claims.” The lawsuit alleges “dramatic inaccuracies” in stated projector lumens (or brightness) of all models manufactured by Curtis International Ltd., including the RPJ116, RP116+, RPJ116-B-Plus, RPJ119, RPJ104, RPJ129, and RPJ136.Įpson claims three of those seven RCA models overstate lumens by 99%, three by 98%, and one by 94%. The amended complaint, which names Technicolor SA as an additional defendant, singles out seven RCA models for having “exaggerated lumens claims” and for using “misleading images of the projectors in a well-lit environment and descriptions of the projectors as ‘super bright.’” for “falsely advertising the lumens of projectors manufactured and sold under the RCA brand name.” Epson America today announced that it has amended its lawsuit against Curtis International Ltd.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |